Congress Criticizes Appointment of Retired Supreme Court Judge as Governor, Calls it Threat to Judiciary's Independence

New Delhi : The appointment of retired Supreme Court justice S Abdul Nazeer as a governor has drawn criticism from the Congress party, which has accused the government of compromising the independence of the judiciary. The party has cited the late BJP leader Arun Jaitley's remarks against such appointments as evidence of the government's disregard for the sanctity of the judiciary.

Adequate proof of this in the past 3-4 years for sure https://t.co/33TZaGKr8x — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) February 12, 2023

In a statement, the Congress party called the appointment of retired judges as governors a "great threat" to the independence of the judiciary, and argued that it undermines the impartiality and integrity of the justice system. The party has demanded that the government reconsider the appointment, and said that it will take all necessary steps to protect the independence of the judiciary.

The controversy over the appointment of retired judges as governors is not new, and has been a subject of debate in India for many years. Critics argue that such appointments compromise the independence of the judiciary, as retired judges may feel obligated to support the government that appointed them, and may be reluctant to take a stance against the government on controversial issues.

In response to the criticism, the government has defended the appointment of retired Supreme Court justice S Abdul Nazeer as a governor, and argued that such appointments are in line with established practice in India. The government has also said that retired judges bring a wealth of experience and expertise to the position of governor, and can make valuable contributions to the governance of the state.

In conclusion, the appointment of retired Supreme Court justice S Abdul Nazeer as a governor has sparked controversy and criticism from the Congress party, which has accused the government of compromising the independence of the judiciary. The government has defended the appointment, and argued that it is in line with established practice in India. The controversy over the appointment highlights the ongoing debate over the role of retired judges in the governance of the country, and the importance of protecting the independence of the judiciary.